A Legend or Not - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 830 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/04/22 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Beowulf Essay Did you like this example? Beowulf; A legend or not? The making of Beowulf was framed on the base of the Germanic Heroic Code. Under this code, a legend exhibits characteristics of quality, valor, a great notoriety, and reliability. While some may contend that Beowulfs egotism cleanses him of his chivalrous title; his self-importance is one characteristic which makes him sufficiently certain to participate in the demonstrations of courage which he does. Beowulf is an Anglo-Saxon legend, and his persona demonstrates this. In the Anglo-Saxon period the qualities which made up a saint are altogether different from the properties which make up a legend in the present society. Despite the fact that Beowulf was solid, gutsy, had a decent notoriety, and was faithful; in the present society he would come up short on the correct abilities to make him a saint today; yet his attributes were immaculate to be viewed as a legend amid the such period. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "A Legend or Not" essay for you Create order Beowulf would show endless quality for the duration of his life, or, in other words highlight of a legend. My hands alone will battle for me, battle for life against the beast. (173-174) speaks to Beowulfs unending dauntlessness. No person in the town would set out go up against such monster significantly less with any weapons however Beowulf, he would not set out battle the mammoth with anything other than rather his exposed hands. Quality being a Germanic courageous characteristic, is an attribute which Beowulf never neglected to display. Beowulfs quality and fearlessness go as an inseparable unit; ( ) without precedent for his life that celebrated sovereign battled with destiny against him. (668-669) shows the flexible strength which Beowulf had. Regardless of, the substantial possibility of casualty which he looked by battling the winged serpent, he never called it quits. In the Anglo-Saxon period these are characteristics which very few held. A notoriety makes the man, and as per Beowulfs notoriety individuals discussed his enormity, his magnificence, lauded him for his gallant deeds ( ) (887-888) Beowulf was commended for an existence as respectable as his name (888-889) which embodies his fabulous notoriety for his fair activities. As per the attributes of a Germanic Hero, Beowulf acquired the normal for a decent notoriety through his valiant demonstrations and honorability. Regardless of, Beowulfs fascination in distinction as a young fellow when he became more established Beowulf had an enthusiasm for his kingdom. My days have gone my as destiny willed, sitting tight for its assertion to be talked, governing and additionally I knew how, swearing no unholy pledges, looking for no lying wars. (748-751) Each deed he occupied with, gave to the benefit of his notoriety, and the benefit of humankind. Beowulf had the title of a respondent or defender all things considered. He had a notoriety for achieving profundities which no other would set out reach. Unwaveringness is the managing power to every one of Beowulfs accomplishments. At the point when Beowulf chooses to help the Danes with battling the considerable monster, Grendel, in addition to the fact that he does it for the development of his notoriety and notoriety, however as a steadfast demonstration to Hrothgar for protecting his dad before. Beowulfs vast faithfulness is likewise shown after his 50 years of being a pleased ruler; when he battles to his passing to get fine fortunes for his realm. Bring me old silver ( ) Death will be gentler, leaving life and this individuals Ive administered so long, on the off chance that I take a gander at the remainder everything being equal. (759-762) Beowulfs versatile dependability to his kingdom is appeared at the times of his diminishing; all he thinks about is being guaranteed that he is leaving his kin with the remainder all things considered. (762) Beowulfs unwaveringness was a chivalrous attribute that was too solid, to possibly be lost. In the Anglo-Saxon period the Germanic Heroic Code, were the arrangement of qualities which made up a legend. Beowulf indicated steady exhibit and responsibility for, for example, interminable faithfulness, endless quality, and a respectable notoriety. Beowulf is the system of a genuine legend in his occasions. He speaks to a man, a ruler, and a saint; whose enthusiasm for acclaim and acknowledgment turned into a connection of devotion to his area. No other individual in his time, was equipped for what Beowulf was. Accordingly, demonstrating on numerous occasions; how Beowulf was in actuality a legend of his period. In actuality, in spite of Beowulfs bravery, in the present society Beowulf would not meet the title of a legend. Present day societys saints comprise of accomplished people, for example, specialists, police men, firefighters, and good examples. Traits which make the cutting edge saint comprise of: knowledge and magnanimity. In spite of the fact that Beowulf was an awesome saint of his chance, hed make inconvenience now. Our general public rotates around the idea of peace and assentions, and Beowulf was a man of making goals through brutality. Endeavors to comprehend the present battles through Beowulfs idea would make endless fighting and pandemonium.

Foster Care and Adoptive Parents in the Latino Community...

Policy Brief: Foster Care Adoptive Parents in the Latino Community Foster Care Adoptive Parents in the Latino Community Foster Care and Adoption are the most multi-faceted areas of child welfare. Foster care consists of placing children outside of the custody of their parents or legal guardians. This out-of-home placement can be temporary or long-term. Adoption on the other hand, consists of the legal and permanent process that establishes a parent/child relationship between individuals not related biologically (Downs, Moore, McFadden, 2009). These two areas of child welfare are constantly evolving and the decisions made on a child’s behalf can affect many areas of their biological, spiritual, social, and emotional wellbeing.†¦show more content†¦Unfortunately, many Latino children fall through the cracks of finding some sense of normalcy after protective services have been implemented. Once in the system, the average timeframe of Latino children in foster care is two years; six months longer than their Caucasian counterparts. (Pichardo, 2003). Latinos Barriers in Foster Care Adoption While the number of Latino children in foster care continues to increase, there is a shortage of Latino foster care/adoptive parents to take children in when they are placed in the system. Although it is not required that a Latino child be matched with a Latino family, it can be of great benefit for the child to be placed within their racial/ethnic group (Bausch, 1999). Reasons for the lack of available foster/adoptive parents in this community are greatly affected by Latino perceptions of foster care and adoption, cultural beliefs, and organizational barriers (Quintanilla, 2002). Many Latinos already provide their own type of informal kinship/foster care to those in their families and communities. In Latino culture, family is highly valued. Being an active part of the family structure is seen as an essential piece to an individual’s identity (Olsen Skogrand, 2009). Family members typically provide support for each other when needed and stress the importance of close relationships in overcoming obstacles (Olsen Skogrand, 2009). Latinos also place importance on connections with extended family and communityShow MoreRelatedThe Goal Of Healing Homes1621 Words   |  7 Pagesdevelop and foster nurturing Hispanic adoptive and foster homes that responds to the cultural, emotional, and behavioral needs of at-risk Hispanic youths in the foster care system. Rooted in the belief that every child walks their own path and has the ability to reach full potential, Healing Homes focuses on a curriculum that teaches parents and caregivers how to be better listeners and supportive parents and enables children to improve. According to Dettlaf Rycraft (2010), â€Å"immigrant Latino childrenRead MoreAdoptive Families : An Early Childhood Educator953 Words   |  4 PagesDescription of Adoptive Families. Adoptive families are becoming a very common thing in today’s society and it is not uncommon to run into adoptive families while working in the teaching field as an early childhood educator. â€Å"Adoption is the legal process whereby a person or persons become a child’s legal parent or parents.† (Gov.nl.ca, 2016) Adoption can be done locally or internationally, â€Å"Many Canadians are choosing to start or expand their family through international adoption. Canadians adoptedRead MoreI Had Never Heard Of Foster Care1754 Words   |  8 PagesPersonal Statement Essay Tara Fisher Boersma, BSW Metropolitan State University of Denver MSW Advanced Standing Applicant Fall 2015 Growing up, I had never heard of foster care. I did not know anyone who had been in foster care and I only knew of one person in high school who lived in a home with abusive parents. I was friends with a handful of people who had been adopted, but was ignorant to the fact that their adoption potentially impacted them on a daily basis and in every area of theirRead More A Social Injustice: the effects of social inequalities in foster care and child welfare3164 Words   |  13 Pagesunderstanding, open-minded individual who does not look down upon anyone that is less fortunate than I am and who does not look to â€Å"more† fortunate individuals as role models. When I am asked how I got to be so understanding, I answer giving credit to my parents’ value system they instilled in me as well as acknowledging their duties as public servants in the City of New York. My father was a police officer who worked in a number of precincts in some of the worst, crime ridden areas of B rooklyn and my motherRead MoreThe Family Of A Single Parent Family2262 Words   |  10 PagesIn the United States, two-parent families were considered the norm. Historically, the myth of the perfect family unit consisted of a two-parent heterosexual home. The family unit has evolved though, and it is far more complex, diverse, dimensional and varies in ethnicity and family members than the status quo. Today, families are made up of same sex parents, adopted children,extended families, children raised by their grandparents, and a growing percentage of women, choosing to be single mothersRead MoreChildren And Children1754 Words   |  8 Pages2001; Rà ¼beling, Keller, Yovsi, Lenk, Schwarzer, Kà ¼hne, 2001) Other studies use children’s drawing of their family to understand how they interact with them (Bannon, Tirella, Miller, 2016). Some studies also look at children’s drawings of their community to learn about what places impact them the most (Quiroz, Milam-Brook s, Adams-Romena, 2014). Researchers also use children photography as a way to engage the children and learn about their environments as well (Alaca, Rocca, Maggi, 2017; QuirozRead MoreBlack Lesbian And Gay Families7002 Words   |  29 Pagesthese families negotiate. Focusing on the resources Black lesbian and gay families provide to the Black community, such as foster parenting and adopting Black children, mentoring runaway and throwaway Black youth and leadership on Black social justice issues, this article will demonstrate the value of Black lesbian gay families towards the larger goal of strengthening all Black families and communities. Keywords: African-American, Marriage Equality, gay, lesbian, youth, family, What is Marriage

From Leninism to Stalinism A Logical Progression Free Essays

The question of whether or not Stalinism was a logical continuation of Leninism is a difficult one. Stalinism did take significantly more drastic measures than Leninism did. There were differences in policy. We will write a custom essay sample on From Leninism to Stalinism: A Logical Progression or any similar topic only for you Order Now But in spite of these, Stalinism still found its basis in Leninism. Even Trotsky, a friend of Lenin and a staunch opponent of Stalin, grudgingly admits that â€Å"Stalinism did issue from Bolshevism† (Trotsky). Stalin’s policy of socialism in one country, his use of terror to eliminate opposition, and his suppression of democracy and the soviets were all characteristics of Lenin well before they were characteristic of Stalin. Although some of Stalin’s policies were different from those of Lenin, what difference Stalinism did show from Leninism were either policies which Lenin had called for but never put into action, or logical continuations of Lenin’s original principles, but modified to suit the demands of the time. One of Stalin’s main focuses was on the concept of â€Å"socialism in one country† – that is, the focus on the betterment exclusively of his own country rather than on the international communist revolution. â€Å"Socialism in one country† began with Lenin. In 1918 Lenin signed the Treaty of Brest-Livtosk, which pulled Russia out of WW1 and surrendered much of the Ukraine to Austria-Hungarian forces (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). At this time, there was a revolutionary movement in the Ukraine composed of peasants and workers known as the Makhnovist movement. This group needed only the support of Lenin and Russia to launch their own socialist revolution. However, they were not given this support (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Clearly, Lenin’s focus was on the well-being of Russia rather than the International Communist Movement. He was focused on Socialism in One Country. Lenin’s actions, compromising his political ideals for the sake of peace, would later be echoed by Stalin when Stalin signed a non-aggression pact with Adolf Hitler on August 23, 1939. In addition to a focus on socialism only within his own country, Stalin also focused on a concentration of governmental control of industry and agriculture. This policy, originated by Lenin under the moniker of state capitalism, was a clearly established goal of Leninism well before Stalin implemented it. Lenin said that â€Å"Socialism isnothing but state capitalist monopoly made to benefit the whole people† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). It is clear that his idea of socialism was one of governmental economic control. Moreover, Lenin fully intended for this plan to be implemented. He said that â€Å"If we introduced state capitalism in approximately 6 months’ time we would achieve a great success† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). As the government gained more and more control over the economy, Lenin felt it necessary to defend his actions. He published an article in April of 1918 in which he stated that â€Å"Unquestioning submission to a single will is absolutely necessary for the success of the labor process†¦ the revolution demands, in the interests of socialism, that the masses unquestioningly obey the single will of the leaders of the labor process† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). In addition to demonstrating the Leninist ideal of state capitalism, it also shows that Lenin viewed absolute governmental authority as necessary, a policy that would be further instituted during the totalitarian rule of Stalin. One aspect of Lenin’s state capitalism was the forced collectivization of agriculture. In article six of his â€Å"April Theses,† Lenin called for â€Å"Nationalization of all lands in the country, and management of such lands by local Soviets of Agricultural Laborers’ and Peasants’ Deputies† (Russian History 1905-30†³). In 1929, when Stalin forced collectivization onto the agricultural workers, he was simply putting Lenin’s concepts into action. Lenin had had the original idea, and had felt it was a necessary action, but he had been unable to put his plan fully into effect. Stalin was able to take a previously incompletely implemented Leninist policy and put it into action. In their attempts to bring the workers under governmental control, Leninists were willing to take drastic action. In May of 1918, a new decree stated that only one third of industrial management personnel could be elected, the rest being appointed to their positions. In April of 1920, Trotsky stated that â€Å"Deserters from labor ought to be formed into punitive battalions or put into concentration camps† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Arguments have been raised which state that Lenin’s New Economic Policy is a demonstration of the fact that Leninism’s goal was not one of total governmental control. However, the New Economic Policy was only instituted by Lenin when it became absolutely necessary for the survival of Russia, and even then it was only intended to be a temporary measure before returning to state capitalism. Despite the temporary nature of the New Economic Policy, it was still viewed by many leading members of the Communist party as being too drastic a departure from Leninist doctrine. When Stalin abandoned the New Economic Policy, he was not abandoning a part of Leninism. Rather, he was banning a policy that even Lenin himself had not intended to be permanent, and that many people viewed as being a policy contrary to the aims of Leninism (Wood, p. 23-26). Stalin was also characterized by his strong suppression of opposition, which is once again a Leninist trait. A decree of the Sovnarkom on December 20, 1917 called for the creation of a commission â€Å"to persecute and break up all acts of counter-revolution and sabotage all over Russia, no matter what their origin† (â€Å"Russian History 1905-30†). The decree further read that â€Å"measures [to be taken against these counter-revolutionaries are] confiscation, confinement, deprivation of [food] cards, publication of the names of the enemies of the people, etc† (â€Å"Russian History 1905-30†). While these actions were admittedly not as drastic as Stalin’s, they do represent a strong, forceful suppression of opposition. In addition, Stalin was in power after these measures had already proven futile. Given the ineffectiveness of these methods, a logical continuation of these policies would have been to increase the severity of the suppression. In addition, other actions taken by Leninism were far more drastic. In a Cheka raid in Moscow in April 1918, 26 Anarchist centers were raided, killing or injuring 40 Anarchists and imprisoning over 500 more (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Another feature common to both Stalin and Lenin was their attempts to eliminate any democratic or representative forms of government. This too was a continuation of a long-standing Leninist policy well before Stalin was in power. Starting in 1918, in elections for factory committees, an approved list of candidates was created beforehand, and voting was done by a show of hands while a member of the Communist cell read the names and armed Communist guards watched on. Voicing opposition to the proposed candidates would result in wage cuts (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Lenin’s suppressions were not limited to non-communists. As Stalin would later do, Lenin also worked to eliminate any possible sources of dissention within the Communist party. In 1918 there was a faction within the party that was critical of the new policy of Taylorism, a system used to measure the outputs of the workers in the country. This faction was centered around the journal Kommunist. At a Leningrad party conference, the majority supported Lenin’s demand â€Å"that the adherents of Kommunist cease their separate organizational existence† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). Three years later, the 1921 party congress issued a ban on all factions within the Communist party. Speaking regarding one of these factions, the Workers Opposition, Trotsky said they had â€Å"placed the workers right to elect representatives above the party. As if the party were not entitled to assert its dictatorship even if that dictatorship temporarily clashed with the passing moods of the workers democracy† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). We can see the dark motivations behind Leninism’s banning of factions: to keep the democracy from interfering with the dictatorship. Well before Stalin was using his power to eliminate any who might oppose him, Lenin was carefully and thoroughly removing the opponents to his power. In the trade union congress of April 1920, Lenin stated that in 1918 he had â€Å"pointed out the necessity of recognizing the dictatorial authority of single individuals for the purpose of carrying out the soviet idea† (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). This concept of a single absolute ruler that Lenin felt was so necessary was to become one of the points for which Stalin was later criticized. In setting himself up as an absolute dictator, Stalin was merely following what Lenin had said was necessary. Another aspect of Stalin’s suppression of opposition was his violent suppression of workers revolts and the soviets. Stalinism crushed revolts in East Berlin in 1953, in Hungary in 1956, and in Czechoslovakia in 1968, as well as many other, smaller revolts (â€Å"How Lenin Led to Stalin†). This policy would seem to contradict the Leninist ideal, in which the government was built for the workers, and a revolt of the workers would have been something that occurred only as a step towards a communist society. However, we can find this policy originating from Leninism. The Leninist government itself often showed strong opposition to attempts made by the workers to increase their power. The first All-Russian Congress of Soviets, held in June of 1917, stated that giving full power to the soviets would have â€Å"greatly weakened and threatened the revolution† (â€Å"Russian History 1905-30†). In 1921, at the Kronstadt naval base, workers attempted to elect a soviet. They also issued a declaration which called for the reestablishment of the democratic soviets, and an end to censorship of speech and press. These actions were supported by the workers, the sailors, and many members of the Bolshevik party. However, official Leninist forces stormed the base, killing many of the rebels who were unable to escape. Leninism had demonstrated that it was opposed to a representative government designed with the wants of the workers in mind. All of the defining policies of Stalinism were either policies that had originally being instituted by Leninism, policies called for by Leninism but not put into action until Stalinism, or else Leninist policies modified to fit the needs of the situation. Stalinism was a logical continuation of Leninism. How to cite From Leninism to Stalinism: A Logical Progression, Essay examples

Social Media and Organizations Balancing Act

Question: Discuss about theSocial Media and Organizationsfor Balancing Act. Answer: Introduction Social media has become a boon to the younger generation as the activity of networking has become relative easy. Information can be sent to any one and every one in split seconds and the number people data reaches to is in millions (Peters, 2013). However, every power has a con. Similarly data shared on social media can be used against the user itself. But is the data private the user is a dilemma. The issue has particularly been debated in organizational setups with the question whether companies can use this information (Van, 2013). The below report argues about three main questions under this subject. How should the organizational policy on social media be, is it okay for the company to use social media information of the employee and how can the organization benefit with social media. The arguments are made with the help of ethical theories, knowledge management, pluralism etc. A Balancing Act Social media has become an important part of life in the technologically advanced world. It has invaded both the personal and professional life of every individual and hence it is no wonder that several employees are mixing up these two aspects (Rokka, 2014). Most of the times it happens that work related posts, organization related issues are put up on the social media, leading to a dispute between the employer and the employee. The concept of privacy has become diluted especially on the data available on the internet. This has led to dilemma whether the employee posts on social media should have some kind of restriction with respect to the employer data (Wilson, 2016). The challenge has raised the need to put up policies against the employees posting organization related data on the social media. By the principle of Utilitarianism a normative ethics theory, the best action is that which results in maximum utility (Barrow, 2015). By setting policies and restricting work related posts on social media the company can not only protect information but also can ensure that the reputation of the company is intact which in turn benefits the employees. It also ensures that the stakeholders information is safe. However, balancing freedom of speech and the extent to which this freedom is allowed is an artistic work. It takes great understanding of the employees and the culture of the company to come up with competent policies. Just for the purpose of Utilitarianism, an employer cannot restrict freedom on social media. One other issue by providing access to the social media in an organizational setup is that the time spent on networking may substantially increase which in turn would reduce the time spent on working. That is the chances of decrease in productivity are high. In such cases, employees are either not allowed to login to social media from the company network or their usage is to be monitored. Monitoring usage will again raise the same issue of privacy (An, 2014). The concept of psychological contract between the employee and the employer comes in to consideration which states that apart from the actual work contract that is signed between the employer and the employee the same parties have a psychological non-verbal contract that is more at a conscious level. Like the employer would let the employee work by himself, provide adequate wages etc., while the employee maintains high production and both the parties would respect and trust each other. With the inclusion of social media, this co ntract is hurt when the employee reduces his productivity or posts inappropriate organizational comments on social media, while restricting the freedom of the employee would be a contract breech from the employers end. However, there is no firm limits for this contract. Hence a policy finds a midpoint amongst these would be ideal (Paris, 2013). There was a time when organizations believed that shareholders where the key members of the organization and everything should be done to ensure that they are happy. However, the evolved organization structure today believes that merely making the stakeholder beneficial is not enough for a company to progress but rather it is necessary to take care of the interests of all its stakeholders both internal and external. This theory is called the stakeholder theory and is proposed by R. Edward Freeman (Harrison, 2013). The major internal stakeholders for a company are the employees and hence as per this theory the company is responsible to maintain a healthy environment in the company. One argument could be to provide complete freedom to the employee. However to keep an employee satisfied, unrestricted social media is not the only solution. Also, employees getting on social media with work related issues will not solve the issues but would aggravate it. Companies have grievance handling c ells that take care of employee issues. Hence it is indeed true that policies put up by employers should not restrict the employee freedom of speech and at the same time employees should not be given the power to ruin the reputation of the company. Indeed, coming up with appropriate policies is a balancing act between the employees not being upset that they do not have the freedom of speech and the consequence the employer has to face if the same is given. Should Employers Glean? The current generation uses the social media as a journal where current moods, status, locations and images are shared and saved on the internet. Several employee take their frustration out on the social media through irrational posts as a mode of communication. The argument behind these actions is the liberty of speech where the employee is allowed to speak what they feel. Commenting on an organization is not offence as people know that it is an individual opinion. However, the same does not stand true vice versa. There is a lot of discussion on the idea if an organization has to judge an employee based on his or her social records. The concept is in discussion as the scanning someone social media is invading their privacy. Social media consists of abundant data regarding an employee. The people they engage with, the places they visit, the food they eat, their thoughts and moods and so on. If a trained psychologist is given this information, the innate characters of a human being can be understood. This can be considered an invasion of privacy as the company would be judging the character by actually looking deep into the persons personality. On the other hand, when an organization, particularly a manager or a colleague who is present in the friend list of the employee views this information it cannot be considered an invasion of privacy. Note that the employee has willfully put up the picture knowing full well that the data will be updated and accessible to everyone permitted (Bulander, 2013). Situations like this cannot be considered as an invasion of privacy. When data is available, the employee has given permission to access the same and the data is not being used for any illegal methods scoping the information to understand the honesty and the actual nature of the employee cannot be called inappropriate (Drouin, 2015). On the other hand recruiting a member based on social media cannot be considered completely correct. The concept of work life balance comes in to scope here. What an employee does outside work cannot be used as a mode for rejected an employee or undermining the same. Recruitment and interview process has to be done solely based on the capabilities and skills of the employee (Stoughton, 2015). Scanning social media in an attempt to avoid illegally involved employees can be considered as good logic but using the same for rejecting employees because of their personal habits is not considered right (Slovensky, 2012). What the employee does outside the organization in their own time cannot be used as a filter in recruitment. Also, organizations inform the employee regarding the background check that would be done before hiring an employee. The clause generally consists of the concept of searching through the internet which is informed to the employee. Background checks when informed and done are correct however going through an employees profile without their consent invasion of privacy no matter what the purpose is (Stoughton, 2013). On the other hand, managers and employees who are a part of the friends list of the employee are given access by the employee and they going through the profiles cannot be considered as an invasion. Using Social Media for the Benefit of the Company Several organizations around the world today have realized the importance of social media. It is one of the most powerful networking tools and is currently in vogue amongst all the employees. Organizations today are seeing social media as opportunity to grow rather than a threat to their reputation (Leonardi, 2013). Any form of communication when used effectively can result in substantial results. Social media can be helpful to connect employees of all levels in an organization which is generally not possible in a conventional setup. With HRM evolving to strategic HRM where the recruitment, training and appraisal are all done based on the organizational objectives, social media has the ability to act as a robust integrator (Treem, 2013). Several companies such as Microsoft, Delottie etc have all established an internal social media platform that can be accessed by all the employees of the company with their work login. These platforms are similar to Facebook, where several internal organizational groups are formed and information and updates are shared across. The employees can also chat with employees of other departments thereby bridging the gap between them. This platform in particular encourages the concepts of knowledge management where information can be shared easily through social media. Finding and communicating with relevant mentors or experts in the company helps lower level employees to fulfill their quest for knowledge (Razmerita, 2014). Also, groups are formed based on technology or department and links of resourceful information, articles, videos etc can be shared to help employees be updated with latest developments in the business or learn new things with ease. For an organization to really grow, the growth of its employees is crucial. Through Strategic HRM employees are aligned to the organizational goals (Cascio, 2015). This inculcates the concept of unitarism where all the employees work towards the welfare of the company. For example, when a CSR event is being conducted in the company, the information, planning and several other activities can be shared over the internal media and sometimes on the external social media as well to keep the employees appraised and involved in the activities (Colleoni, 2013). On the other hand, though an employee may belong to one department or one technology they may look for opportunities to learn new things or see what other departments have to offer. In a conventional company setup, to search for the challenges an employee may have to go through the HR or another departments manager. This is a tedious task. With the help of an internal communication network, employees can easily identify the possible o pportunities and directly communicate to the anchors to work on them. There is always an issue with freedom of communication. The employees should know how to talk, when to talk, what to put on an internal networking site and the way of communication with higher employees. Given that the employees have free access to all other employees including high level mangers it is crucial that the employee realizes how to handle communications especially with seniors (Schaupp, 2016). It is true that the boundaries between two levels of employees are nullified in the new organizational setup, but it is also true that seniors should be treated with respect especially when looking for opportunities to learn and grow through them. For the same purpose organizations have policies in place to let the employees know how to communicate and clearly define what matters are not to be dealt online. Social media is also a key in improving the publicity of the organization. Making announcements on external social media and involving employees in such activities will not only build the reputation of the company but also of the employee (Gonzalez, 2013). Congratulating a top runner on social media will be a pride for the employee. Employers also turn up to social networking sites such as LinkedIn where professionals put up their profiles. This is helpful for recruiting and finding SME to hire on contract basis there by having in hand the profiles of eligible candidates which makes the process of scanning portfolios simpler. Conclusion Social Media has become an inevitable inclusion in the life of the younger generation and the privacy of social media information is in question, especially when work related data and opinions are given over social media. To curb any negative effects that may rise due to the same organizations need to develop policies that sensibly restricts its employees from posting inappropriate data. The data on social media can be accessed by the organizations only after consent from the employee. Companies can make use of the networking technology to increase the productivity of the employee through internal discussions and blogging for knowledge management. References An, J., Quercia, D., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., Crowcroft, J. (2014). Sharing political news: the balancing act of intimacy and socialization in selective exposure. EPJ Data Science, 3(1), 1. Barrow, R. (2015). Utilitarianism: A contemporary statement. Routledge. Bulander, M., Kearney, M., Bruneau, D. (2013). Balancing relevancy privacy concerns related to the production of social media content. The Buzz on Information Matters, 1-3. Cascio, W. F. (2015). Strategic HRM: Too Important for an Insular Approach. Human Resource Management, 54(3), 423-426. Colleoni, E. (2013). CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corporate Communications: an international journal, 18(2), 228-248. Drouin, M., OConnor, K. W., Schmidt, G. B., Miller, D. A. (2015). Facebook fired: Legal perspectives and young adults opinions on the use of social media in hiring and firing decisions. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 123-128. Gonzalez, E., Leidner, D., Riemenschneider, C., Koch, H. (2013). The impact of internal social media usage on organizational socialization and commitment. Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business ethics quarterly, 23(01), 97-124. Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1-19. Paris, C., Colineau, N., Nepal, S., Bista, S. K., Beschorner, G. (2013). Ethical considerations in an online community: the balancing act. Ethics and information technology, 15(4), 301-316. Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A. M., Ognibeni, B., Pauwels, K. (2013). Social media metricsA framework and guidelines for managing social media. Journal of interactive marketing, 27(4), 281-298. Razmerita, L., Kirchner, K., Nabeth, T. (2014). Social media in organizations: leveraging personal and collective knowledge processes. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 24(1), 74-93. Rokka, J., Karlsson, K., Tienari, J. (2014). Balancing acts: Managing employees and reputation in social media. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(7-8), 802-827. Schaupp, L. C., Blanger, F. (2016). Social Commerce Benefits for Small Businesses: An Organizational Level Study. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 28(3), 49-66. Slovensky, R., Ross, W. H. (2012). Should human resource managers use social media to screen job applicants? Managerial and legal issues in the USA. info, 14(1), 55-69. Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., Meade, A. W. (2013). Big five personality traits reflected in job applicants' social media postings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 800-805. Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., Meade, A. W. (2015). Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 73-88. Treem, J. W., Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Wilson, J. (2016). Employment law: A balancing act: Effective management of workplace disrepute by employees. Ethos: Official Publication of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory, (239), 38.